Politics

Koldo García denies from custody having received money for the Partido Socialista Obrero Español

Koldo García rejects reports that businessman Víctor de Aldama handed him 300,000 euros in cash for the Partido Socialista Obrero Español. The Audiencia Nacional is conducting a sealed… investigation into the payments

Briefing

Koldo García, former aide to the former transport minister José Luis Ábalos, has repeatedly denied from pre-trial detention receiving Partido Socialista Obrero Español money. The reports stem from media coverage and statements by businessman Víctor de Aldama, who says he has handed over cash transfers and a bundle of documents relating to the Venezuelan oil company PDVSA to the investigation.\n\nThe investigation is being conducted at the Audiencia Nacional; the investigating judge in charge is Ismael Moreno. According to sources in the justice system, Moreno has opened a separate, confidential section of the case to examine claims about cash payments to the party apparatus.

The judge requested documents from the Partido Socialista Obrero Español concerning cash withdrawals from 2017 to 2024 and forwarded the information to the public prosecutor.\n\nAccording to published reports, Víctor de Aldama claimed that at least 300,000 euros from circles within the Venezuelan government had reached his accounts; he said he had withdrawn cash and personally handed over some of it. De Aldama has also delivered an envelope referring to PDVSA to the Audiencia Nacional, which he links to financing he alleges took place. Media reports have in part linked the claims to De Aldama’s previous convictions: the Tribunal Supremo convicted him in the so-called mask case.\n\nThe presumption of innocence applies to the specific allegations against Koldo García; no court findings have so far established unlawful party financing.

García explicitly rejects the account that money was handed to him for the Partido Socialista Obrero Español. Investigators are keeping the examination of possible party financing separate from the ongoing procurement investigation in the so-called Koldo case.\n\nLegal consequences will depend on the evidence; if the claims are confirmed, criminal and party-law proceedings could follow. Until reliable court rulings are issued, the facts remain unresolved, and claims cited in reports must be strictly distinguished from proven facts.

Editor: Phillipe Schmidt-Araguin (Article created with AI assistance).

Sources

End of article

Advertisement

From the PHOTRA network