Latest

European Public Prosecutor’s Office expands investigation into European Union funds for Madrid–Seville

On 6 November 2026, the European Public Prosecutor’s Office opened a second case in Madrid into possible fraud involving EU funds for work on the Madrid–Seville high-speed line and carried out searches at Adif, AESF and the Tribunal…

The European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) opened a second investigation on 6 November 2026 into suspected fraud involving EU funds in connection with work on the high-speed line Madrid–Seville . According to its statement, searches were carried out at the same time at the infrastructure manager Adif, the Agencia Estatal de Seguridad Ferroviaria and the Tribunal de Cuentas . The measures were supported by the Guardia Civil, specifically the Unidad Central Operativa. Citing the high level of public interest, the authority made an exceptional public confirmation of the case but initially gave no further details.

The investigation now under way concerns EU payments for the renewal and modernisation of safety, signalling and communications systems along the line. On 20 March 2026, the European Public Prosecutor’s Office had already opened a first case into the suspected misuse of EU funds. At that time, the focus was on maintenance work on a section near Adamuz in the province of Córdoba . The second case builds on that investigation and extends it to other measures covered by EU funding. According to reports in Spanish media, the current investigative measures also cover the section near which a serious accident occurred on 28 October 2026 at Urda . However, the European Public Prosecutor’s Office makes clear that it is not currently releasing substantive details about the subject of the investigation.

The European Public Prosecutor’s Office is empowered to prosecute offences affecting the European Union’s financial interests. It can investigate in member states and work with national investigative authorities. The involvement of the Tribunal de Cuentas and the national safety authority suggests that both procurement and payment records, as well as the implementation of technical specifications, are being examined. Possible consequences range from criminal proceedings against those responsible to administrative penalties and recovery of EU funds.

Attributed statements and forecasts remain cautious: the European Public Prosecutor’s Office refers to the exceptional circumstances prompting its confirmation and offers no assessment of possible responsibility. Whether and to what extent the prosecutorial investigations will be linked to technical accident investigations or national proceedings remains unclear. Until the analysis produces solid findings, for example in the form of indictments or court decisions, allegations of guilt are unsubstantiated. For now, the only clear point is that two European Public Prosecutor’s Office investigations into the Madrid–Seville line are active in parallel and that the Spanish authorities are providing operational support.

Editor: Mira Cadena (Article created with AI assistance).

Sources

End of article

Advertisement

From the PHOTRA network