Briefing
The Ertzaintza has adjusted its communications policy on identifying the geographical origins of detainees. The Department of Security told parliament in Vitoria-Gasteiz on 6 November 2026 that information on origin would continue to be included in regular crime statistics reports, but would in future be mentioned in press releases only “in particular” in cases involving serious offences. The authority cited examples such as sexual violence, robbery, homicide offences or the use of knives.
The Consejero de Seguridad Bingen Zupiria justified the measure as a way of countering the possible stigmatisation of entire population groups while preserving transparency in cases of particular public interest. He also said that public statements would in future additionally indicate whether detained or accused people police records have a record. This distinguishes police records from criminal convictions; the term “police records” was emphasised several times in parliament.
The decision follows a recommendation made by the Ararteko that information on origin should be published only when relevant to understanding a specific case, and presented in a way that avoids unfounded links between origin and crime. A majority in the Basque Parliament had previously opposed the blanket mention of origin; groups including PSE-EE, EH Bildu and Sumar had voiced criticism.
Critics warn that the term “in particular” still leaves considerable room for discretion and could lead to inconsistent application. Data protection advocates and the ombudsman’s office announced that they would monitor how the new communications guidelines are implemented and assess whether they are proportionate. It remains unclear how the guidelines will be applied by municipal police forces and whether a consistent practice will emerge across the autonomous community.
Editor: Mira Cadena (Article created with AI assistance).